data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47f9d/47f9d1f9bd28ab4cbfea759fd7260e23bb7a1d38" alt=""
The commercial notion that Love = sex/power never ceases to amaze me. It seems to be based around the idea that to be attractive to a mate on February 14th, women must wear 2" strips of nylon and a square of synthetic satin that causes static and should go nowhere near a naked flame (that's the candlelit atmosphere kaput then). Now this is fine, if you are the same shape as those shop mannequins and can keep very still once you have placed the eyewatering thong/suspender combination in a straight line. But, put a menopausal, slightly chubby (ok flabby) woman with thread veins and prizewinning muffin-tops in the same outfit and you get, well .....er..... not quite the same effect. Sure, husbands all over the land will say: "but I love you just the way you are and you will always look sexy to me in stocking tops" and women all over the land will really, really want to believe them...we really do.... still it's convincing ourselves is a whole different kettle of kippers.
And the pressure is not just on the women. Dig deep in your wallets gents, because according to the stereotypical marketing mind, the only way to prove your love is through jewellery, big old expensive jewellery and preferably diamonds. Oh yes, none of your cheap tat will do here mate, the only way to get your lady into that pair of stockings is by showing her how rich and powerful you are and jewellery is soooo romantic, isn't it? The message is: MEN: Darling, I would really like you to wear this (thinking: hmm.. red and black basque). WOMEN: Darling, I would really like to wear this (thinking: hmm..that ring from Tiffanys. The reality of course is that this idea of Valentine's Day only really applies if you are a) young ; b) not single; c) are of a certain body shape and attractive, and d) heterosexual.
I realise this is probably making me sound like a crusty old maid and misery guts, but it's not the jewellery or the lingerie that is the issue for me - it's the pressure and the stereotypical, basic nay, caveman level on which the commercial industry form their idea of Love and Romance. Of course, I can only speak for myself, but I know that prancing around the bedroom to a Barry White CD whilst wearing nothing but a pair of red sequin heart-shaped tassels from Poundland and a spray of Chanel No5 is going to produce neither attractive qualities, nor a sense of underlying oneness any more than my husband whipping out a pair of QVC Diamonique pearl-drop earrings from his edible posing pouch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05b04/05b043c73f5bfc00950673d5396413c416573b49" alt=""
Brilliant! That should have been in one of the nationals.
ReplyDeleteThank you very much for your kind comment. I hope it made you smile..
ReplyDelete